I didn't like the transcript format. It's too verbose and cluttered with irrelevant details. I find the 'regular' format much easier to read.

Can you give an example of the the direct quotes you mention? Other than the straight up transcripts I didn't notice much difference from previous minutes.

CCP Ytterbium: GÇ¥Something I really don't like in Factional Warfare, is just the capital hot drop. To me it has nothing to do with what Factional Warfare is supposed to do.GÇ¥
Elise: GÇ£Well I don't know, triages are pretty cool small gang PvP thing.GÇ¥

I lol'ed. Hope you guys don't believe small-gang PvP can utilize carrier, otherwise it would be really ridiculous. At the very least it takes like 10 damage-dealers alone to counter a single triage carrier and defining a gang of 15 as small will show just how blobtarded eve has become.

You are definitely missing a true small-scale view on PvP, something between 1-5 man, where logistics are not used but constant communication is compulsory.

concerning the POS ideas : I do like a lot what was said, but as also said, removing forcefield will be a big issue for fleet on 0.0.

for people who don't know, we can wait 20-40-60mn on the staging POS, waiting for jump bridge or for call to go manually.
it would obviously not be possible without a protection, as given the time we'll often be afk.

and it can't be done docked, as we can't see the situation while docked.
we need to know if it's safe to undock... or simply if the fleet is still here !

an anchorable shield as proposed would be okay, but there must be something. you may ask for sov3-4-5 and/or a bill for it if you don't want it everywhere.

but I see it again ; except for FF (where I wonder what the good solution is) I loved what I read here.

currently it takes ages to mount a POS, which look like a pile of junk without any soul, so having a modular system, with only one unique object which looks great and where we can dock would be really great for immersion.
we don't feel "at home currently" on a POS.

Trebor mentioned that not having a force field would be a big change to the way fleets often operate, and Greyscale mentioned that he would be looking into that.

I understand that you guys want more accountability and transparency.

However, this report is 165 pages of jibberjabber.

Is there a bulletpoint version for those of us that don't care about your needs to be accountable and proper and transparent and all that is "good"?

If not, I guess I'll take a over the next few weeks but right now there is a lot of stuff I don't need to know/care for and it will take time to filter out all that stuff.

Thanks!